So the next time you need to tell a staff member you need to run a >> CUSTOMER >>ACCOUNTS>>ACCounT PRICING >> CUSTOMER PRICING SHEET --- you could shorten that to a 6 1 2 5 ... you will remember the easy & everyday used items first and slowly the rest become committed to memory
So --how about numbering the menu's -- it gives us an extra way to make things easier ....
From: "Rick Young"Date: March 2, 2005 8:59:44 AM GMT-05:00To: "Greg HENDERSON", Cc: "Dave Johnson", "Doug Crowe" , "Emmet McLellen" , "Moe Armstrong" , "Serge Peladeau" , "Roy Hedges" , "John Chachere" Subject: RE: Exploris questions - Alternates -- Numbering Menu's - using866XplorisReply-To:
Greg,
Regarding question(s) ..........(snip) ......
Number 4, I like the idea of numbers but I believe your suggestion may
( snipped out #1 thru #3 for clarity )require a good deal more work than just adding the number. We would also
have to design a way for Exploris to "read" your number inputs so that it
would then know which main category and sub-categories to go to. I will
bring this up in our next meeting with the developers.
Rick
-----Original Message-----
From: Greg HENDERSON [mailto:Greg.Henderson@wrenchead.ca]
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 3:51 PM
To: david.credle@gpi.com; Rick Young
Subject: Exploris questions - Alternates -- Numbering Menu's -
using866Xploris
Hello David or Rick
4) can anyone vote on if we should number the menus ...for example if you
numbered the menus -- adding a alternate would be a 3-1-6
Inventory is 3rd main group
Part Entry is the 1st under Inventory
Part Association is the 6th under Part Entry ..hence 3-1-6.
I like the numbered menus -- I have been used to them all my jobber life
-they serve a purpose especially once someone is good with the system
...like J-Con 2-13 --who knows what that is ...see my point .... People who
know the system can save time by the 'numbers'
Regards
Greg Henderson
No comments:
Post a Comment